Liu, Jun: Why the Labor Productivity in Socialism
|
|
Date: 9/29/2006 11:01:50 AM
Sender: Liu, Jun
|
Liu, Jun: Why the Labor Productivity in Socialism Country is Low?
Socialism distribution according to work constructed by Marx has huge attraction to any person making a living by work, but to this day whether it is feasible is still a riddle. According to Marx, value principle doesn’t function without merchandise and currency. How is exchange inevitable under division of work equally made? At first view, the quality and quantity of everyone’s labor are restricted by time, skill, condition and attitude four big factors, and this need a objective distribution criterion which exactly reflects the four big factors. Without the criterion and necessary condition achieving it, the exchange will not be made equally, the laborer will not be enthusiastic, labor productivity will not be improved, and there will be no real socialism
Classification laborage system only reflects one factor-skill, to the most it is distribution by skill. CCP without understanding metaphysically regards it as distribution by work and the issue is surely not solved. As for laborages determined by leader, by individual and by collectivity are all subjective criterions. Equalitarianism and Mess only simplify the issue. All of these will absolutely not create higher labor productivity than capitalism. On the contrary, if surplus labor is not accounted, under the effect of market mechanism, capitalism distribution according to value created by necessary labor time is generally consistent to the purpose of distribution by work, and it is the basic pivot of high capitalism labor productivity. From former Soviet Russia to mainland China, there are no countries so-called Socialism indeed to practise socialism, and the economic cause is without objective criterion of distribution by work and relevant necessary condition achieving it.
Liu, Jun
Nov. 3, 2005
|
|
| |
